Hello,
Could you please double check the area type comparison table in the show notes?
I think it is supposed to be more like this:
| ~~~~ | Type | O | O-IA | O-E1 | O-E2 | ASBR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Stub | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
| Totally Stubby | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
| NSSA | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | |
| Totally Stubby NSSA | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | ~~~~ |
@Arctic said in CCNP: OSPF Area Types Part 1&2 - show notes:
Hello,
Could you please double check the area type comparison table in the show notes?
I think it is supposed to be more like this:
~~~~ Type O O-IA O-E1 O-E2 ASBR Standard Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Stub Yes Yes No No No Totally Stubby Yes No No No No NSSA Yes Yes No No Yes Totally Stubby NSSA Yes No No No Yes ~~~~
Thanks for pointing this out. We switched the NSSA and Totally Stubby in our table. I'll try and get this changed!
update: I've submitted the change and it should be reflected in our notes!
Cordially,
Ronnie Wong
Edutainer Manager, ACI Learning [ITPRO]
*if the post has answered the question, mark as solved.
**All "answers" and responses are offered "as is" and my opinion. There is no implied service, support, or guarantee by ITProTV.
