Cisco CCT Routing and Switching (100-490) Course Issues (Certified Technician Routing and Switching)

---

In the Use Windows to Troubleshoot Basic Networking video between the 5th and 6th minute mark from the Servicing Cisco Devices section, could you tell me why is there a 0% loss for the ping statistics that reflects an unreachable destination host? Isn't that suppose to read "(100% loss)" instead or is that an error or misnomer in the cmd prompt? It's not like it's a packet tracer.

FURTHER EXPLANATION:
The previous ping accurately displayed a "(66%" loss)" or 2/3 loss (receiving only 1 packet out of 3 which is inversely only a 33% success rate because of the remaining 2 that didn't make it) with a destination host unreachable status. But the issue in question just below that - a 0% loss - should mean 100% success because there's NO LOSS! Right?

@Sherwin-Sherman,

In the 1st ping issued, it means that the device was unresponsive...usually this is from ARPing. Then the last ping had a reply which means the device responded with a message of Destination host unreachable. So here, with ARP there was no reply in the first and second responses (Request timed out)--no response from the ARP ...then post ARP...the device replied.

Then the 2nd ping issued. The device is responsive with replies. Here it tells us that the pinged device is up and replying just not with a response that we want, 100% of the time. You can see from the Ping statistics for 10.0.99.210: it is exactly as you've posted... (0% loss).